TL;DR
Turn your wind-down time into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
Researchers analyzed gut microbial genetic variants from 10,781 people and found associations with 69 human traits and exposures, including age. The results suggest bacterial genetic variation can reveal patterns that species-abundance measurements miss, but they do not show that the variants cause aging or disease.
A study of 10,781 people has linked genetic differences within gut bacteria to human age and dozens of other traits, reporting that many associations were not apparent from the abundance of the bacterial species alone. The research, published in Nature, maps possible connections between microbial genetics and health, but does not establish that the variants cause aging or health conditions.
Researchers led by scientists at the University Medical Center Groningen analyzed whole-genome metagenomic data from 11,831 stool samples across six independent cohorts. Five cohorts were from the Netherlands and one from Tanzania. The team examined microbial single-nucleotide variants, or SNVs: differences at individual positions in bacterial DNA, including differences between members of the same species.
After quality filtering, the analysis covered about 12.7 million common SNVs across 433 bacterial species. The researchers tested these variants against 244 host characteristics, including 157 intrinsic traits and 87 environmental exposures. Their analysis accounted for bacterial population structure and other factors, and results were compared across cohorts.
The study initially identified 49,346 supported associations between variants and 69 host traits or exposures, adding to research on the gut’s role in aging. Grouping correlated variants produced 940 independent signals: 810 related to intrinsic characteristics and 130 to environmental exposures. Age had the most signals, with 99 involving 8,117 variants across 42 bacterial species, a finding relevant to research on gut bacteria and brain aging. About 86% of the independent signals had no significant association with the abundance of the corresponding species.
A machine-learning model using microbial genetic information explained 12.8% to 42.0% of age variation in independent test datasets, according to the report. This is a statistical prediction result, not evidence that the microbiome can determine an individual’s age or that changing bacterial genes would alter aging.
Genetic Signals Beyond Species Counts
The findings suggest that studies measuring which bacterial species are present, and how abundant they are, may miss some variation relevant to host traits. In this analysis, 65.74% of independent signals were not significantly associated with species abundance. The genetic differences within a species may therefore offer another way to investigate how gut microbes relate to human biology.
That distinction matters for future microbiome research: two people may have similar species profiles while carrying bacteria with different genetic variants. The study offers a map of associations that researchers can test in other populations and laboratory work. It does not show that the detected variants are useful for clinical prediction, or that they explain differences in people’s health or lifespan.
Products Worth Considering
Fitbit Versa 2 Health and Fitness Smartwatch with Heart Rate, Alexa, Music, Sleep and Swim Tracking
Therabody SmartGoggles 2nd Gen Heated Eye and Temple Massager
Withings BPM Connect Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Blood Pressure Monitor
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Microbial Species to Variants
Gut microbiome studies have linked microbial communities to chronic disease and metabolism, but species-level measurements can obscure genetic differences among bacteria of the same species. Earlier research had associated some microbial genomic variants with conditions including inflammatory bowel disease, gastric cancer and type 2 diabetes. The Nature study sought to examine such relationships across a broader set of host characteristics and exposures.
To reduce the chance that associations simply reflected different bacterial lineages, the researchers used a statistical model that accounted for within-species population structure. They analyzed each cohort separately before combining evidence through a sample-size-weighted meta-analysis. The study included cohorts from different settings, although most participants came from the Netherlands.
One reported example involved five missense variants in the sarA_2 gene of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, lineage I. These variants were associated with host age and fell in a region encoding a protein involved in an oligopeptide transporter complex. The available source material does not provide enough detail to establish what effect these variants have on the protein or on the host.
“The researchers investigated associations between gut microbial single-nucleotide variants and a broad range of human health phenotypes and environmental exposures using a phenome-wide association approach.”
— The study authors, as summarized in the News-Medical report
Association Is Not Causation
The findings show statistical associations, not that bacterial variants cause aging, disease or other human traits. The researchers’ age-prediction results also do not establish a biological aging measure: the model predicted chronological age, and its performance varied across test datasets.
The supplied report does not describe the biological effect of most associated variants, nor does it establish whether host traits shape microbial genetics, microbial genetics influence host traits, or both reflect other factors. Most participants were in Dutch cohorts, so it is also unclear how well the associations apply to populations beyond those studied. The report excerpt ends before giving the full result for people carrying the age-associated sarA_2 variants.
Testing the Signals in People
The next steps are to replicate the associations in additional populations and investigate whether the strongest variants change bacterial function. The sarA_2 finding could be examined through targeted analyses of the transporter-related protein and the bacteria carrying the variants. Researchers would also need to test whether any signals remain informative after accounting for host health, diet, environment and other influences.
No clinical test or intervention follows directly from these results. The study provides candidates for further research; whether microbial genetic profiles can improve understanding or prediction of aging and health remains to be established.
Key Questions
What did the study find about gut bacteria and age?
The researchers reported 99 independent age-associated signals, involving 8,117 bacterial genetic variants across 42 species. These are associations and do not show that the variants cause aging.
How is a bacterial genetic variant different from a bacterial species?
A species is a group of related bacteria. An SNV is a difference at one position in DNA, so members of the same species can carry different variants.
Did the study show that gut bacteria determine a person’s age?
No. A machine-learning model using microbial genetic information explained 12.8% to 42.0% of chronological-age variation across independent test datasets. This is a prediction result, not proof that bacteria determine age or alter aging.
Why do the results matter if species abundance was not associated?
Many independent genetic signals were not significantly associated with the abundance of the relevant species. This suggests that genetic variation within species may reveal patterns that a species-count approach misses.
Can these findings be used as a medical test now?
The report describes research associations, not a validated clinical test or treatment. More replication and work on biological mechanisms would be needed before clinical use could be assessed.
Source: news-medical.net
